http://mavericktester.com/in-defense-of-the-humble-spreadsheet The startup's software tester Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:47:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://mavericktester.com/in-defense-of-the-humble-spreadsheet#comment-617 Anne-Marie Wed, 20 May 2009 07:24:02 +0000 http://mavericktester.com/?p=153#comment-617 <a href="#comment-616" rel="nofollow">@Norvitz</a> Thanks for the comment Norvitz, It looks similar to the Zephyr approach except perhaps less expensive. Unfortunately, it doesn't suit my purposes as I consult to small companies who would be unable to see defects after I left, unless they paid for extra user licenses. As most of the companies I deal with are small, its an overhead I don't want to put on them. I am looking into alternative approaches at the moment, such as hosting testlink on my webserver and then allowing access per project. @Norvitz
Thanks for the comment Norvitz, It looks similar to the Zephyr approach except perhaps less expensive.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t suit my purposes as I consult to small companies who would be unable to see defects after I left, unless they paid for extra user licenses. As most of the companies I deal with are small, its an overhead I don’t want to put on them.
I am looking into alternative approaches at the moment, such as hosting testlink on my webserver and then allowing access per project.

]]> http://mavericktester.com/in-defense-of-the-humble-spreadsheet#comment-616 Norvitz Wed, 20 May 2009 06:39:46 +0000 http://mavericktester.com/?p=153#comment-616 That's the reason we're using Practitest - which is SaaS. This means that there is no need to install configure or maintain. You just need to login and work. Still you have the benefits of a Test Management tool, like reports, coverage, etc. That’s the reason we’re using Practitest – which is SaaS.
This means that there is no need to install configure or maintain. You just need to login and work. Still you have the benefits of a Test Management tool, like reports, coverage, etc.

]]>