<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back To Basics: Automated Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mavericktester.com/back-to-basics-automated-testing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mavericktester.com/back-to-basics-automated-testing</link>
	<description>The startup&#039;s software tester</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie Charrett</title>
		<link>http://mavericktester.com/back-to-basics-automated-testing#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-Marie Charrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mavericktester.com/?p=555#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kevin, I appreciate that and its a good idea. I suppose one reason why you get lesser case studies is that they&#039;re more work.  When you want a case study, is it from a tester&#039;s perspective or a startup&#039;s small business perspective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin, I appreciate that and its a good idea. I suppose one reason why you get lesser case studies is that they&#8217;re more work.  When you want a case study, is it from a tester&#8217;s perspective or a startup&#8217;s small business perspective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://mavericktester.com/back-to-basics-automated-testing#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mavericktester.com/?p=555#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to create the site, some nice aspects to it and advice - much appreciated. But to be honest I cannot see any benefit in just another bland - general article on automation - any google search on test automation would give more detail. This is what the test community suffers most from - people talking about a subject without actually describing how to do it - many, many careers are built of this kind of waffle. Well ....if you can get away with it ......not meant to be offensive - its just I think you could serve readers better by delving into actual case studies - how to demos etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to create the site, some nice aspects to it and advice &#8211; much appreciated. But to be honest I cannot see any benefit in just another bland &#8211; general article on automation &#8211; any google search on test automation would give more detail. This is what the test community suffers most from &#8211; people talking about a subject without actually describing how to do it &#8211; many, many careers are built of this kind of waffle. Well &#8230;.if you can get away with it &#8230;&#8230;not meant to be offensive &#8211; its just I think you could serve readers better by delving into actual case studies &#8211; how to demos etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie Charrett</title>
		<link>http://mavericktester.com/back-to-basics-automated-testing#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-Marie Charrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mavericktester.com/?p=555#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>thats a good point Sam,  sometimes its more worthwhile to put the effort into manual testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a good point Sam,  sometimes its more worthwhile to put the effort into manual testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
