Author Archives: Anne-Marie Charrett - Page 2

Jumping to conclusions

Good testers continuously ask questions about the product, the customer and the project environment and invariably on themselves.

No question, no test.

When were satisfied with the explanation we stop asking questions, we stop being inquisitive. For testers, its essential to keep asking questions for as long as possible.

On the other hand, a test manager deals in conclusions in response to deadlines and an expectation from stakeholders.

This puts a test manager in the unenviable position where on one hand they need to encourage their testers to question, but on the other they need to be able to satisfy their stakeholders with conclusions.

A test manager has to deal with this conflict of inquiry and conclusion in the testing they deliver. If a test manager focuses only on deadlines and delivery, the desire to reach conclusions quickly will filter into the testing they manage. Testers will start feeling the pressure to deliver answers instead of ask questions.

Test managers need to be conscious of the impact deadlines and being project driven can have on a tester’s ability to find bugs.

If you’re a test manager, be mindful of the impact that deadlines & resulting conclusions may have on your testers. Avoid the temptation to drive testing with the goal of delivering ‘the simple answer’ because stakeholders expect it.

Strive for open mindedness and inquiry in testing. Avoid easy explanations and quick conclusions.

Or even better, encourage stakeholders to reach their own conclusions about the testing that’s being performed. Now that would be a real victory!

The School of 1

Like many testers I’ve been watching the unfolding drama of school versus approach that is taking place in  Context Driven Testing community with part dismay, part fascination and part anger.

That’s a mixed bag of emotions and it bothers me.

Two people that I hold in such high regard are not speaking to each other. People that I have worked with and respect deeply. On a personal level that saddens me. From a professional testing perspective, not so much as good testing will continue to thrive as long as testers are devoted to their craft.

But something angers me about this whole debacle. Lanette Creamer describes this as estranged family but to me it more like when a couple decides to divorce and the friends end up divorcing too. To be fair to both James and Cem, neither have suggested that this is necessary. James has stated he still has a huge respect for Cem. I admire him for that. Similarly, Cem has never suggested that ‘sides’ have to be taken.

Why then, do I feel that I’m being put in a position that I have to chose between the two?

Emotions aside, this whole debacle has challenged me to try and logicaly reason about what I think. Where I see myself.

I am a Context Driven Tester. I don’t want to test in any other way. I won’t test in any other way. If its an  an approach then I’m not going to take any other. I guess according to this post, that makes me part of the Context Driven School.

Yet I do agree with Cem. The idea of schools is polarizing and sometimes I feel uncomfortable when other schools are denegrated publicly. Regardless of schools, I respect thoughtful testers who work in these paradigms.

My solution at times like this is too look to myself. Reaffirm what I believe and move on with my work. I will continue to test in a way that I believe is best for me. I will continue to treat testers who I admire regardless of school with respect. I hope that means being able to work with both Cem and James (albeit independently) in the future. Time will prove if thats possible or not.

So in the mean time I will continue to study testing, help others test and focus on growing a vibrant testing community in Sydney. If that means I end up in a school of one, then so be it.

 

Please don’t hire me

If you want perfect software
If you want me to break your code
If you want to measure me by the number of test scripts I write
If you want me to tell you its ready to ship
If you want 100% of your product tested
If your looking for a tester to only “check” if things look ok
If you want your testers to mindlesslly follow test scripts
If you want training on a test process
If you feel you can’t test without requirements

But if you’re looking for a tester who prides herself on the work she delivers, offers as much value to her clients as she can, and has a reputation for excellent testing, then yes, please hire me!

I’m available for coaching testers, training testers, consulting and testing.

Contact Details